March 20, 2008
March 19, 2008
Tug-of-War Over The Classroom
Teachers and Unions Fight Over Who Controls the Classroom

Teachers want more control over their classrooms? How dare they! Who do they think they are? Our public school systems are no place for classroom specific teaching strategies created by teachers who best know how to meet the needs of their students!
Wait a minute. Isn’t that type of school system and teacher exactly what our children need?
Not according to teacher unions in Denver who convey this message as they abuse their control over how classrooms are run through their strong-arm hold on teacher contracts. Often the contracts made available to teachers systematically give the unions control not only over teachers' pay, health care and retirement packages, but also over how they are and are not allowed to structure their classroom activities, according to a New York Times Op-Ed written by Andrew J. Rotherham. Rotherham is co-founder and co-director of Education Sector, an independent national education policy think tank
Frustrated teachers simply want more control over their classrooms. That is, they want less control given to certification boards, one-size-fits-all federal stipulations and last but certainly not least, their unions. According to Rotherham, groups of teachers in both L.A. and Denver are struggling to win more control over teacher hiring, pay and how they may utilized their work day.
This tug-of-war, both in and out of the classroom, is just one more of the seemingly endless examples of road-blocks that teacher unions pose for teachers, parents and children -- or anyone trying to forge real and significant change in our school systems.
Rotherham suggests that providing a broader range of contracts to teachers that better fit their their schools' specific characteristics and their students' instructional needs would not leave unions obsolete. Rather, it would allow them to become an “agent of progress.”
Surely the chances of teacher unions becoming true academic stewards by simply diversifying teacher contracts is minute. However, any footing that teachers can regain, in the fight over who runs their classrooms, would be a tug in the right direction.
October 24, 2007
Classroom Voices
The Los Angeles Times has an interesting educators’ blog, The Homeroom, allowing teachers to raise and discuss the issues they face in the classroom. As an example, I’m posting the strand about the plagiarism problem a young teacher published and a few of the comments from other teachers. The anonymous comment telling her to “get over it” is puzzling and demonstrates not all comments are thoughtful, but many provided perspective and good advice. I agree and practice giving a “0”, major goose egg, for plagiarized papers.
Lauren McCabe writes:
As I sat at the airport last weekend, grading my students’ summer reading essays and waiting to take off, I was angry. Not because of the tardiness of my flight, but because I was looking at 15 plagiarized essays from my seniors, seniors who knew better. They had all summer to read a book and write this five-paragraph essay on any topic they wanted. After I read over two essays and saw the exact same words, sentences and paragraphs, it wasn't hard to figure out that these papers had been copied.
After talking with some of my colleagues over the weekend, I learned that plagiarism wasn’t a new concept at my school, Environmental Charter High School, and that most of the students on my list had turned in plagiarized work in the past. I began to wonder why students plagiarize. Could it really be that they were just too lazy to write their own papers? And the essay they turned in and tried to pass as their own was of very low quality. Didn’t they have respect for themselves and their abilities?
While I was venting my frustration to an administrator at my school, he offered a bit of insight into the community I teach in and he grew up in. He explained that the major battle these students are fighting every day does not necessarily come from an external source, but from within. The inferiority complex is a constant war within our students. They “dumbed down” their essays to a level so far below their actual writing abilities because they thought it would be more believable to me that way. They ran away from this challenge because they didn’t believe they could achieve on their own.
This is not to say “poor babies” or to give excuses for blatant plagiarism, but I think it is important to understand the mindsets with which our students walk into the classroom every day and ways by which we can expand those views. Pure laziness is only one possibility of many for explaining why students plagiarize, as is the inferiority complex. But until we consider all of the possibilities and stop labeling students, we will never solve the issue. Malleable intelligence, the concept of intelligence not being fixed, will be the first topic of discussion that I start off with in my next class.
Comments
This is simply immaturity, laziness and seeing if they could get away with it....
Here is what I do...I don't make a big deal about it. I just put a 0 on their papers and write, " Same as Julie's paper; 0 same as David's paper" I don't moralize, I don't lecture, I don't call their parents. It takes me 10 seconds to write it on the paper. I usually never have a plagiarism issue again.
I'm sure you gave your students the option to contact you should they run into difficulty and provided an email or phone number, so there really are no excuses for the plagiarism.
Again, in high school ,students must pass a class to move on to the next grade level , not like in middle school, which is another reason they are turning in poor quality work.
One practical thing you can do and you may already be doing this for students who have trouble structuring an essay is to write out five to seven sample topic sentences for each essay: The background sentence, thesis sentence and 3 to 5 supporting topic sentences and a concluding sentences and have them "build" the essay. This way they have a template to begin using. Santa Monica High School has a website with a paper called the "Sweet Sixteens of Good Writing" It is a helpful handout with sixteen boxes that offer tips on good writing.
Another hint, don't leave the topic wide open but give them five or six options. They still have choice but also have something concrete about which to write. Did you connect the essay to the book they were reading? This way they have to read the book to write about it in the essay.
Great job giving a summer assigment as you are way ahead of the game in knowing a little about each student and their work ethic. It also gives you information that allows you to adjust and correct what you want in your upcoming reading and essay assignments which puts you way ahead of the game. Keep it up!
Posted by: evelyn
Posted by: Anonymous
This is not your fault. It is a break down in the system. This is learned behavior that has most likely happened in the past without consequence.
In any serious academic institution, plagiarism is a serious offense. I hear you saying that the administrator, in sentiment, excused the behavior. Why didn't the administrator offer to come to your class and deal with this problem so you can focus your mind and energy on curricular and instructional issues?
I don't want to be too cynical, but I can guess at the answer. First, the system emphasizes attendance and seat time. Any serious discipline must have the possibility of suspension as its ultimate consequence. Administrators hate suspensions because it takes away from attendance and makes the school's discipline statistics look bad.
I like the advice of evelyn. Don't moralize on the issue, but absolutely don't accept plagiarism. The students will figure it out for themselves. You can focus on being the best English teacher you can be, and model professionalism to the students. Too many teachers stray the academic path in an attempt to be life coaches.
Posted by: David
The pattern of plagiarism that I've heard about is that in this internet age, the kids often have really bad process for their writing. So, you'll see a lone plagiarized sentence in a single paragraph, or you'll find that the student's work is a strange hybrid of original and plagiarized work, even when hunting down the material to plagiarize and weaving it into a coherent text must actually have been more work. They need extremely explicit instruction in how to write and how to include citations. You might want to explain to them that using citations impresses the teacher, because it demonstrates that you've done a lot of research.
Posted by: Amy P
October 8, 2007
The other transition: elementary to middle school tips
As the previous post asks what goes wrong in the middle school to high school transition, this post offers sage tips for teachers in handling the elementary to middle school transition.
Teaching Secrets: Organizing Middle Schoolers
By Laurie Wasserman
Teacher Magazine
What characteristic is most common among brand-new middle school students? It's not a physical trait (they come in an amazing assortment of shapes and sizes) or an emotional state (adolescents are famous for their mood swings). What they most have in common is this: They are disorganized. And why wouldn't they be? In most cases, new 6th graders have spent their first five years of school with a single teacher for the majority of the day. They entered elementary school each morning, hung up their coats, and stowed away their lunch boxes. Their homework, pencils, lunch money, and personal gear were stuffed in a nearby book bag or in their desk. Their textbooks were neatly stacked in a single, familiar classroom. Now, suddenly, they're middle schoolers, and the world's turned upside down.
They are given a combination lock, a hallway locker, a homeroom, and a schedule that often has four or more subject-area teachers whom they will see on any given day. There's more work to do – and more teachers who expect them to do it. This is where the child with significant organizational challenges becomes both overwhelmed and frustrated.
As educators, what can we do to support these students who often come to our classrooms without their necessary materials and homework assignments? Here are some tips from my special education classroom that can help any student bring order to chaos.
Agenda Books – If a school can provide each child with an agenda or assignment book, this is a terrific, consistent strategy. There are companies that sell them for $5 or less. Teachers can begin their classes by asking students to take out their agenda notebooks, and then write the next homework assignment on the board as students jot it down. In my own classroom, I stroll around the room checking to make sure each of my students has copied the assignment down correctly and written it in the right place (middle schoolers will often write it in the wrong day – or month!). If funds aren't available to purchase agenda books, I’ve run off assignment checklists on the copy machine and distributed them each Monday in stapled sets of five. It’s not as ideal, but still quite feasible.
Schoolnotes.com – This is a free Internet tool that allows educators to post our assignments online. All a parent or student needs to do is go to the site (from home or a public library) and type in their zip code. Any teacher who uses the service will be listed in alphabetical order, under the name of the school, and by grade or subject. Teachers can also provide their school email address, in case a parent or student needs homework clarification at night or wants to send a document when there's no printer available. Many parents who have Internet access at their jobs welcome the opportunity to check their child’s next-day assignments before they leave work. Imagine the look on their child’s face the first time mom or dad asks them if they brought home their study guides for tomorrow’s science test!
Preparation Grade – As a strategy to promote organization, I count preparation as part of my students' overall subject grade. I allow them to go to their lockers, if they forget a book or a pencil. But each trip to the locker costs them 1 point from their preparation grade. It sounds harsh (and most of my students have ADD/ADHD), but I find if they know my policy ahead of time, and I’m consistent with it, they learn by trial and error. I also loan them pencils, but ask for a sneaker as collateral. Their missing sneaker helps them to remember to return the pencil as they leave the room.
The Absent-Student Crate – I print assignments out and place them in a 3-ring binder titled "Schoolnotes," which resides in the Absent-Student Crate. This gives the kids a running record of what assignments they have missed while they were out. I also keep a 3-ring binder for each subject I teach, with the various handouts I have distributed, so the students have an archive to reference. I keep track of who's absent by asking the student who is passing out papers to write the names of any absentee on the handout and place it in an accordion folder also kept in the crate. When the absent child returns, I remind him or her to check the crate for any handouts or incomplete assignments. Basically, I'm modeling good organization for my kids.
The I.O.U. Board – I have an I.O.U area on my board with the assignments students owe me (with their names listed below each assignment). If a child is absent during a test, or owes me a project, he or she can immediately see their debt. In my special ed classes, I also use this for students who owe work to their mainstream teachers.
The TEAM Homework Area – I keep a running list of all homework assigned by the teachers on my 6th grade teams. The students can refer to this board if they've forgotten to copy any assignments down in other classes. I also utilize this board for my regular-education homeroom students.
Pocket folders, a cheap way to help kids – An inexpensive way for students to keep track of various written assignments they need to complete is to take a 2-pocket folder, available at any office supply store, and label the left side with “To Do” and the right side with “Completed.” They are ONLY allowed to put works-in-progress in this pocket folder. Once the assignments have been completed, the work can be transferred to the appropriate binders or notebooks that the teacher may require.
A final thought: Kids will be kids. It’s hard sometimes to realize that students don’t deliberately misplace papers, forget pencils, or lose track of assignments. They just don't have our experience or habits of mind. It’s our job to teach them the tools and strategies for getting organized and feeling successful.
Laurie Wasserman is a 6th grade special educator in Medford, Massachusetts. A National Board Certified Teacher, she works with students who have learning disabilities, both in self-contained and mainstream classrooms.
September 24, 2007
Good idea to get administrators back in the classrooms
The Las Vegas Review-Journal correctly pointed out the good idea of administrators spending a little time teaching. Many administrators are completely out of touch with teaching, or at least teaching in the environment which they currently oversee.
I remember one principal completely changed his tune about teaching a given population after just a few weeks of taking on a math class. This principal had a “what’s the problem” attitude regarding teaching them until he had to do it. Afterwards he became cognizant that the problems teachers had been telling him about for some time were valid obstacles to learning.
Given these same administrators evaluate teachers, are considered educational leaders, and are dealing with subjects, levels, and populations they often have no experience with, it seems reasonable to expect them to “show us” how they would do it. The administrators’ union spokesperson said a mouthful admitting many of his members have not taught in years.
Another issue is many students do not know who the principal is in the larger schools. Twice, with two different principals, in the course of a few years, students asked, “Who was that?” after the principal observed a class I taught. I’ve also seen the opposite, where the students did know the principal too well and disrespected him when he was around. In this case, the administrator actually avoided student contact as much as possible.
The arrogant remark from the administrators’ union spokesperson that legislators who passed this law should observe classrooms rather than the administrators who claim and get paid for educational leadership reveals some administrators talk a good talk, but will squirm and whine loudly if forced to walk the walk.
Las Vegas Review-Journal
EDITORIAL: In the classroom
Compulsory attendance; administrators as teachers
The Clark County School Board last week moved to put in place a couple of changes approved by the Legislature earlier this year -- one that makes eminent sense, and one that doesn't.
First, the good news.
The board voted unanimously to implement a modest proposal to require that administrators actually spend some time in the classroom.
Under the plan, school district bureaucrats -- including Superintendent Walt Rulffes -- will teach or observe in a classroom for at least a half-day each school year.
No, a half-day isn't much, but it's a start toward recognizing complaints from teachers that administrators are out of touch with the day-to-day realities of the district's operations. And if administrators try to slide on this mandate -- for instance, by showing a video instead of actually trying to engage students -- let's hope teachers blow the whistle.
Predictably, Steve Augspurger of the Clark County Association of School Administrators union -- Question for another day: Why do bosses need a union? -- was whining about the requirement.
"If anybody should be observing classrooms, it should be the legislators who passed this law," he said. "We can't find enough qualified teachers. We can't find enough substitutes. So you exacerbate the problem by having administrators teach who may not have taught in a long time."
Forcing district desk jockeys to spend three hours a year in an actual classroom will cause problems? Boo hoo. Sell it to the rank and file.
Mr. Rulffes said he'd do his part, entering a classroom to teach algebra or maybe geometry. Perhaps he can concoct a formula to explain the relationship between school spending and student achievement.
Now, the bad news.
In approving the "administrators in the classroom" plan, the board also OK'd a provision raising the compulsory attendance age to 18 from 17. That means a student who hasn't yet completed his senior year in high school couldn't voluntarily leave until he turned 18.
Now, this isn't as bad as the plan floated earlier this year by the National Education Association to force kids to stay in school until the age of 21 -- really -- but it's certainly moving in that direction.
What exactly is the point? To lower the dropout rate? To encourage more students to attend college? Is there any evidence this will work? None that anybody offered to the board on Thursday evening.
And why do we want to clog up classrooms with 17-year-olds who obviously have no desire to be on campus? Is this good for the students who are truly trying to learn? How?
In fact, such students can cause disruptions that sidetrack teachers and distract other students.
Kids are already held in captivity by the public school system for 11 years. If the district hasn't succeeded by then in equipping a student with the basics he needs to survive in the real world, what good is another year going to do?
If this proposal is about easing the dropout rate or some other policy goal, it's doomed to failure. If it's a way for the district to secure funding by keeping more butts in the seats, it's shameful.
September 6, 2007
Words of warning!
Do not under any circumstances break test guidelines or security. CYA! Make sure administration assigns at least 2 teachers to monitor testing in each classroom. If you are assigned to test alone, you are vulnerable to potential allegations and should put in writing objections to administration before the scheduled testing.
Help with test may lead to suspensions
Teachers would get five days for reading questions to students
By Emily Richmond
Las Vegas Sun
Apparently believing their students were being set up to fail, two Clark County special education teachers refused to follow testing regulations and instead read aloud the questions on a statewide reading exam.
The state education department has recommended the teachers each be suspended for five days, even though Keith Rheault, Nevada's superintendent of public instruction, originally wanted them suspended for 30 days.
The incident took place March 22 at Doris French Elementary School during a standardized test used to measure student progress, as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Schools that score poorly face progressively harsher penalties.
The suspensions must be approved by the State Board of Education, which oversees teacher licensing issues. Darrin Purana, assistant director of employee-management relations for the Clark County School District, said he could not discuss the specifics of the incident at French. However, his office conducts its own investigation when this type of situation arise s , and teachers can face penalties at the district level as well, Purana said.
Rheault said he supported the scaled-back sanctions after taking a closer look at the circumstances. He said it's possible the teachers were trying to spare the students from what was perceived as an unreasonable demand for performance, rather than attempting to inflate test scores.
Although the U.S. Education Department has expanded the list of how students with special needs can be accommodated in testing, teachers say the questions are still beyond the grasp of many of their pupils. Students not fluent in English also struggle with the tests.
In cases similar to what happened at French, teachers' actions, although misguided, are often an "act of caring," said Sue Daellenbach, testing director for the Clark County School District.
"Taking these tests can be a stressful thing for students, particularly those who are severely disabled," Daellenbach said. "Teachers are by nature caring people, and it's a tough thing to have to watch your kids struggle. But even if you think you're helping your student, you still have to follow the law."
At French, "the teachers admitted they were aware it is not permissible to read a reading test aloud, but believed they were acting in the best interest of the students," according to a state report summarizing the incident.
In addition to the suspensions, the state recommended a letter of admonition be placed in each teacher's personnel file.
The names of the teachers involved were not released by the district. Three other Nevada teachers were charged with improperly helping students with tests during the 2006-07 school year. Two teachers received 30-day suspensions, and the remaining case is to be heard next week.
Evolving use of technology to cheat
How widespread is cheating by students? Most of us are shocked by the lazy nature of it to avoid simply studying combined with the lack of remorse when we catch them.
For cheaters, iPods are playing their song
Students use devices to save answers, data for exam day, state report says
By Emily Richmond
Las Vegas Sun
Move over, cell phones and calculators. There's a new device joining the list of banned items for Nevada's test-taking students - the iPod.
The usual suspects - cell phones, passed notes and the good ol' peek over the shoulder - still lead the list of cheating techniques.
But the state education department's annual report on testing improprieties for the first time includes incidents of students sneaking iPods into exams. In some cases teachers allowed the devices to be used, apparently unaware they could help student s cheat.
"Kids are getting clever, aren't they?" said Sue Daellenbach, testing director for the Clark County School District.
Keith Rheault, Nevada's superintendent of instruction, said iPods may not seem like an obvious choice for cheaters. But "you can put anything on those things," Rheault said, including audio recordings of class lectures, recitations of mathematical formulas or other content that could help a student answer questions on an exam.
The report itemizes all testing mishaps and cheating reported by schools on the high school proficiency exams and standardized tests given in grades three through eight. The tests are used in part to measure student progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Students must pass the high school proficiency exam to graduate.
For the 2006-07 academic year, more than 300,000 students were tested at more than 600 locations. There were 130 reported irregularities, such as missing answer sheets, a 10 percent drop from the prior year.
The total includes 47 incidents of students cheating, a slight increase over the prior academic year but more than double the 23 incidents reported in 2004-05. Educators say the cheating figures for the past two years can be considered a trend, even though the raw numbers are low in the context of the number of tests taken.
Rheault said he wants schools to tackle the largest source s of problems - cheating with electronic devices, and teachers misunderstanding what kinds of extra help they are allowed to give students with special needs.
"We're still getting a lot of teachers who either didn't provide accommodations when they could have, or provided them when they shouldn't have," Rheault said.
Part of the problem is that Clark County, which accounts for about 70 percent of the state's K-12 students, has to train more than 2,000 new teachers annually in proper testing procedures and policy.
"There's a constant learning curve," Daellenbach said. "Even with the best training , there are going to be schools that have someone doing something for the first time, and there are going to be human errors."
Among the reported incidents:
• At an alternative high school in Carson City, a teacher's cell phone rang during the math proficiency test . He left the room to take the call. When later questioned, 15 students admitted either cheating or using their cell phones during his absence. The tests were invalidated.
• At Churchill County High School, two students turned in identical answer sheets on the math proficiency test after helping each other with the answers. They were also permitted to listen to their iPods during the exam.
• At the Clark County School District's Community College West High School, a student was observed using his cell phone during the 11th grade writing proficiency test. The student later admitted using the phone to look up a vocabulary word.
• Testing at four schools was interrupted by fire alarms. Three may have been caused by pranksters, but at Mt. Charleston Elementary School in Nye County, there actually was a fire.
July 10, 2007
Teachers attacked
Re-posted from Teacher Magazine Web Watch
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/webwatch
Teachers Attacked
Reports of assaults against teachers seem to growing, particularly in big city schools. Sometimes they are verbal. Sometimes they are violent physical attacks. NPR’s Fresh Air host Terry Gross speaks with two veteran teachers, Ed Klein and Frank Burd, who were physically assaulted last year in their Philadelphia classrooms. Both Burd and Klein are white and taught at predominantly African American schools; however, neither perceived the incidents to be entirely racially motivated.
Music teacher Klein was relocated to a school one month into the school year when his former school dropped their music program. Entering a new school, with a class that was busy testing the limits and a staff that was overwhelmed, Klein struggled to get control of his classroom. Klein called parents frequently and, for the most part, they were responsive. He even saw changes in student behavior in a few cases. One day, however, a student told him he’d better stop calling home or he’d be sorry. Following that exchange, Klein was sprayed with a fire extinguisher on two consecutive days. On the third day, four students forced him to the floor where he suffered a broken jaw and a concussion.
For his part, after he approached a student to turn down his iPod during class, veteran math teacher Burd remembers little of his attack. Five broken bones and a brain injury later, Burd says, “I don’t feel betrayed by the students, I feel betrayed by the kid who did it.’
Will either teacher return to the classroom? Klein admits to good days and bad days, but is not sure if he will ever teach again. “I’m in a difficult position,” he told Gross. Said Burd, “I need to work. I like to work and I like teaching. I don’t know right now about the classroom. ...”
Posted by Elizabeth Rich
June 25, 2007
Zero-Sum Game
Posted on Teacher Magazine's Web Watch by Amanda Jones
Despite continuing concerns about school safety, some state lawmakers are questioning zero-tolerance policies on weapons, alcohol, and drugs in schools, saying they can unfairly punish students who have harmless intentions. “A machete is not the same as a butter knife. A water gun is not the same as a gun loaded with bullets,” says former school board member and Rhode Island Sen. Daniel Issa, who is sponsoring a bill that would allow school districts in his state to decide punishments for student violations on a case-by-case basis. Stories of the no-tolerance laws gone too far are widespread. For example, according to the Associated Press, a Rhode Island kindergartener was suspended after bringing a plastic knife to school to cut cookies. Ditto for a Utah student who gave his cousin some cold medicine. Utah recently changed its drug policy so that asthmatic students were allowed to carry inhalers. The American Bar Association, the American Psychological Association, and some parents have spoken out against zero-tolerance policy. “You’re dealing with individuals,” said Christine Duckworth, a mother of a recently graduated high school student in Rhode Island. “How can you possibly apply one law to every single person and their circumstances?”
May 22, 2007
How safe are our schools in Nevada?
TeacherTalk NV raised this issue on March 19, 2007. Do you feel safe? Are Nevada’s schools and districts doing enough to protect students and teachers? There are policies and then there are realities, which vary from site to site. Read below and let us know.
Criminalizing Student Threats
By The Associated Press
Nashua, New Hampshire
Dorothy Morin, a teacher at Nashua High School North, says that when students threaten her or other teachers, they don't face much in the way of consequences.
"I think it's gotten worse over the years. It's escalated because nothing has been done. There's no deterrent," Morin said. "Our lives are in danger every day as teachers."
Testimony by Morin and others persuaded members of a state Senate committee to recommend a bill that would add criminal threatening to the list of offenses covered by the state's Safe School Zones law, which increases penalties for certain crimes committed on school grounds, including the sale or possession of illegal drugs.
Rep. Maureen Mooney, R-Merrimack, is the prime sponsor of the bill, which would let school districts take more action against students who threaten violence against other students or staff. She said she was motivated by recent incidents of school violence.
"I just think it's of the utmost importance to do everything within our power to ensure that safe school zones are exactly that: safe school zones," she said. The House has already passed the bill.
Claire Ebel, director of the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, objected to the inclusion of threatening, however. She said that while the other offenses covered by the Safe School Zones law involve actual violence or wrongdoing, a threat could be simply an act of stupidity.
"This seems like a very broad sweep for the state to take," she said.
The bill, which originally would have required expulsion for criminal threatening, was amended to give school districts more leeway. Sarah Browning, of the state Education Department, said schools already have broad authority to suspend or expel students who threaten others.
"I don't think passing this bill changes that, except that it's now more explicit," she said. "I think it makes clear what authority school districts have."
The bill also requires reporting, she said. Any witness to an offense covered by the Safe School Zones law must report it to a supervisor, who must notify police and note the incident in the student's permanent record.
According to a 2005 survey, nearly 9 percent of New Hampshire high school pupils reported being threatened or injured with a weapon on school property at least once during the previous year. Boys were three times as likely as girls to be threatened or injured, according to the 2005 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
A survey by the National Center for Education Statistics found fewer threats against teachers in 2003 than a decade earlier: a drop from 12 percent to 7 percent. However, it also found that teachers in bigger cities were much more likely to face threats.
May 21, 2007
Creative or just twisted?
Sunday, May 20, 2007
Associated Press
BOULDER, Colo. — Writing teachers are being tested themselves these days in trying to discern whether a student is another Stephen King, a Seung-Hui Cho, Eric Harris or Dylan Klebold.
"It's a subjective phenomenon, being able to identify the difference between art and pathology," Sidney Goldfarb, a University of Colorado professor told the Camera.
Goldfarb, who has taught creative writing for four decades, once assigned 21 students to write short stories. Two wrote of suicide; the other 19 murder.
Last month an Illinois high school student was arrested after writing an essay describing his dreams of shooting people and having sex with dead bodies.
Columbine gunmen Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris portrayed hit men in a video they made for a high school government and economics class. The English Department at Virginia Tech referred Cho to the school's counseling service because of his violent writing.
Jeffrey DeShell, chairman of the CU English department, said he couldn't recall a student in the creative-writing program ever being referred to counseling for homicidal writing or odd classroom behavior. Some students have been referred to mental-health professionals when their writing reveals that they could be suicidal.
"We live in a violent society," said Matt Burriesci, associate director of the Association of Writers and Writing Programs of Fairfax, Va., which represents creative programs at 400 colleges and universities.
"There is a very thin line between monitoring someone with psychological problems and someone who is just writing about violence. Pick up a Stephen King novel or a John Grisham novel."
King, in an essay posted on EW.com, said after all the school violence his own college writing would have raised red flags, "For most creative people, the imagination serves as an excretory channel for violence. We visualize what we never actually do."
He added, "On the whole, I don't think you can pick these guys out based on their work, unless you look for violence unenlivened by any real talent."
DeShell said murder is a common way for novice writers to kill off their fictional characters. In one of Shakespeare's earlier plays, Titus Andronicus, nearly everyone dies. Students also may be trying to shock professors.
"A lot of students are trying their imaginations out," he said. "We should be a place that is somewhat safe for that."
Lorna Dee Cervantes, a faculty member who teaches poetry workshops, said teachers should not encourage students to write about violence.
May 14, 2007
Tips on cheating techniques
I had a clever teacher when I was in high school who wanted to learn about cheating techniques that he may not be aware. He asked our class to use any and all types of cheating methods for a quiz the next day on a meaningless, long series of numbers and letters for the fun of it.
The next day he gave us the quiz and was able to recognize how all but two of us cheated. I forget the technique the other student used, but the teacher was curious about mine as he could not tell how I pulled it off as he was watching me closely.
I explained I had cheated on the cheating test because I memorized the sequence and did not cheat. He had a good sense of humor and appreciated the irony. In the same spirit of catching these students is the article below.
Cheat Sheet
Teacher Magazine
By Amanda Jones
Forget writing on hands or whispering answers. Many students have traded the cheating techniques of yesteryear for more sophisticated methods.
Below are a few of the more innovative ways students have tried to gain an unfair advantage. You have to wonder what these students would accomplish if they were to apply such creativity and determination to a more constructive endeavor—like studying.
Water bottles: Students write answers on the inside of a bottle’s label, then reattach it, so the writing is visible through the water during the test.
Cell phones: In addition to text-messaging answers to one another, students take pictures of the test, then beam the images to friends. Others photograph their notes ahead of time.
M&M’s: After assigning each candy color a multiple-choice letter, students line up M&M’s on their desks in the order of the answers.
MP3 players: Before the test, students record answers and then listen to them through earphones during exams.
Invisible-ink pens: Kids write notes or formulas on a sheet of paper in invisible ink, then use the pen’s ultraviolet flashlight during the test to reveal what they’ve written.
Personal digital assistants: Students send information to one another through their PDAs and use the devices to store formulas and notes.
April 27, 2007
Will empowerment help?
Will empowerment help our system of education? I believe it will if we are also empowered as individual teachers. We can be far more effective if given the professional freedom for innovation we deserve to get results. Many of us leave teaching because of this lack of freedom as outlined in Why teachers quit.
Next crop could include middle and high schools
By ANTONIO PLANAS
REVIEW-JOURNAL
April 27, 2007
Principals and teachers of at least four more Clark County School District campuses will get to make more of the decisions regarding their schools in the fall, Superintendent Walt Rulffes said Thursday.
Rulffes is to meet today with regional superintendents and other district administrators to formulate a plan for choosing the school system's next empowerment schools.
Rulffes said that although there hasn't been any scientific evidence of school improvement, anecdotal evidence is strong that the schools will produce higher student achievement.
"We want to continue to expand empowerment schools," Rulffes said. "The early signs are very favorable and we want to at least double the schools."
You can read the entire article here.
April 23, 2007
School dress codes
Do tighter school dress codes help? How vulnerable are male teachers when they enforce it on scantily clad female students and does the administration back them up? Emily Richmond with the LV Sun ran the following article today. She raises the first question but does not mention the second.
Zina Wangila woke up Friday morning, pulled on a pair of her favorite jeans and headed off to class at Mojave High School. By 11 a.m. she was on her way back home, having violated the school's dress code. She had worn blue jeans.
Mojave is one of three high schools, 15 middle schools and 25 elementary schools in the Clark County School District that have adopted dress codes more strict than the district's basic wardrobe guidelines, which ban hats, bare midriffs and skimpy skirts.
Principals at an additional 18 campuses want to adopt the tougher guidelines and will find out this week whether the request has been approved by parents.
You can read the rest of the article here.
April 17, 2007
It's Time We Talked about Performance Pay
By Betsy Rogers
Teacher Magazine www.teachermagazine.org
Published: April 11, 2007
A few years ago, an excellent young teacher asked a question I could not answer. Nodding down the hall at a distant figure, she wondered: "Why do I get the same pay as Ms. Early?”
Her real name is not “Early,” but I always think of her that way, because she effectively took “early retirement” years ago. Unfortunately, she’s still a member of our faculty at Brighton, a high-poverty K-8 school on the outskirts of Birmingham, Alabama, where I’ve served as the school-improvement coach since completing my term as National Teacher of the Year in 2003.
During my NTOY experience, I spoke many times about my belief that all children deserve—and must have—quality schools staffed by well-prepared teachers who know how to help them succeed. When my NTOY year ended, the inequities in the quality of education in my own state drew me to Brighton, which has been ranked as one of the lowest performing schools in Alabama for many years.
Let me tell you something about the young teacher who found herself questioning our compensation system. She put herself through college by working in retail, and she continues to work some nights and weekends to make ends meet. She has taught at our school for five years, and her students have consistently achieved at high levels by every available measure. She spends many extra hours preparing for her class and schedules after-school meetings with our reading coach to assure herself she is on target with each child. She has also served as the supervising teacher for two student-teachers, whom she recruited to our faculty and mentored without financial reward during their first year of teaching.
Meanwhile, Ms. Early spends little or no time in preparing for her class or contributing to the improvement of our school. Her students consistently achieve at very low levels, and she is a constant source of concern for our faculty, administration, and school district.
Thinking back to that hallway conversation three years ago, I think the young teacher asked me a very valid question. In my opinion, it was a discussion that was long overdue. Perhaps if the education and policy communities had been more proactive about rewarding teachers for outstanding performance, we would not see half of the nation’s new teachers leaving the profession within five years.
When the opportunity came in late 2005 to join in just such a discussion with 18 outstanding teachers from across the United States, I eagerly said yes. For the past year, our TeacherSolutions team, supported by the Center for Teaching Quality and the Teacher Leaders Network, has considered how teachers might design a compensation system that could accelerate both teaching quality and student achievement.
Our best thinking is captured in the newly released study, "Performance-Pay for Teachers: Designing a System That Students Deserve." This is not your typical “think tank” report on education policy. It showcases the authentic voices of educators who understand how schools work—teachers who have been successful with every kind of student, in every kind of setting. We do not represent any professional organization or political party. Our diverse membership spans across all grades and content areas and includes republicans, democrats and independents; union and nonunion teachers; and teachers who work in school systems with and without collective bargaining.
Our aim has not been to describe a performance-pay plan that can be quickly unpacked and installed in each and every school district in America. We understand these plans must be tailored to local conditions, with teachers as full partners in the process. Our goal is to encourage—even provoke—a deep conversation about quality teaching and how a variegated pay system could support the development of teaching as a profession.
We identify four areas where we believe teachers should be able to earn additional compensation. We propose that new pay plans reward teachers who:
• help students learn more;
• develop and use new knowledge and skills;
• fulfill special needs in the local labor market; or
• provide school and community leadership for student success.
We make it clear that the first step in building a new incentives-driven compensation system for teachers is to get the base-pay system right. But we cannot stop there. We have to provide more for those teachers who continually go above and beyond to ensure high academic gains. We have to provide rewards for teachers who step out and become leaders in their schools. We need incentives that support teachers who work in teams to help students achieve more, or who reach out to the community beyond the school to increase support for student learning.
Working in a high-needs school has created for me a never-ending sense of urgency for improved student achievement. I have so wished teachers had been respected partners during the policy debates over No Child Left Behind, long before it became a law. I know how much better it could have been written with teacher input. We simply cannot let another opportunity to improve our profession pass us by.
Our TeacherSolutions recommendations are nuanced and not easily summarized, and I encourage you to download the report and executive summary and devote an hour of your time to reading and reflecting on the ideas we propose. Believe me, I know what an hour of teachers’ time is worth. But I am convinced this issue will not go away (just look at the “pro comp” debates now raging in Florida and Texas). You may not agree with us, and that’s okay. We just hope you will do your professional homework and join the debate.
This issue is too important for us to rely on others to “represent” our interests. We must be fully prepared to share our own understandings and unique insights. I truly believe that, together, we can design a system that students and teachers deserve.
One day soon I want to be able to answer the young teacher in my school with these words: “Yes, you are going to be compensated for your outstanding efforts. And you will have many more opportunities as your career progresses. So stay with us. Teaching is worthy of your talents, your intellect, and your desire to serve. We need professionals like you, and you will be rewarded for flying high.”
Betsy Rogers is a school-based improvement specialist for the Jefferson County School District in Alabama. She writes about her experiences in the blog Brighton’s Hope. She also chairs the Alabama Governor’s Commission on Teaching Quality, a 72-member group that includes 57 current and former classroom teachers.
April 9, 2007
Teach 4 Success is a joke
We have had in-services and observations under Teach 4 Success. I think the bottom line is the district is using it to blame teachers instead of the system for low student achievement. These pretended observations are drive by in nature. They claim they can "observe" student engagement and call it data by popping in a class for 10 to 15 minutes. Sleepy students who closed the late shift at Taco Bell drive down your "engagement" score. I think it’s a crock hidden behind their hard numbers, "data."
Here's what one Nevada school district reported in its District Improvement Plan:
March 27, 2007
Are You "Empowered" or Micromanaged?
In the name of NCLB, many administrators have chosen to micromanage teachers. Empowerment has the opposite approach, allowing those of us in the trenches to make the judgments necessary to get results. Do you feel "Empowered" or micromanaged?
Massachusetts' recent decision to offer charterlike freedom to four of its lowest-performing schools has renewed debate about the role autonomy plays in school improvement: Should it be earned through good performance, or given as a vital tool for improvement? Is it risky to extend it to struggling schools?
Interest in the issue is keen. The New York City and Chicago school districts are engaged in high-profile experiments with giving schools autonomy. Both the governor of Nevada and a coalition of groups in Connecticut are proposing legislation to give principals more authority to decide the pathways to better student achievement.
You can read the complete article here.
March 20, 2007
Are You Tired of the System Coddling Disruptive Non-Students?
Isn't it time to make parents pay for their kids (non-students) peeing in the educational pool? As we know, it only takes a few real pissers to disrupt the learning for an entire class (the educational pool). All your preparation and work is dissipated by these non-students who are not attending school to be students and intent on undermining your right to teach and the other students' right to learn.
Across the school level, it is the same few bozos who undermine education with repeated visits to administration. Whether the administrators do anything about it is another story as it varies greatly from administrator to administrator and school to school.
There's good news in that this problem is finally being recognized by lawmakers and reported in the media. Ray Hagar's article "Lawmakers want parents to pay for unruly students" in the March 20th Reno Gazette-Journal reads:
Sens. Joyce Woodhouse, D-Henderson, and Dennis Nolan, R-Las Vegas, told a Senate committee Monday that slapping a fee on the parents of unruly students might help get them more involved in their children's education.
"Maybe we will get the parents' attention if by no other way than hitting them in the pocketbook," Nolan said.
The students assigned detention would be those who consistently disrupt the classroom and the learning of other students, Nolan said. The pay-for-detention concept would be the last resort before students are expelled, he said.
You can read the entire article here.
January 15, 2007
Repeal compulsory attendance laws!
This piece from New York's City Lights magazine spotlights a subject that gets far too little public attention -- the fact that our compulsory attendance laws often effectively turn our public school classrooms over to little savages and thugs, and teachers are expected to simply cope with them.
How I joined Teach for America
— and got sued for $20 million
By Joshua KaplowitzIt was May 2000, and the guy at Al Gore’s polling firm seemed baffled. A Yale political-science major, I’d already walked away from a high-paying consulting job a few weeks earlier, and now I was walking away from a job working on a presidential campaign to do . . . what?
Well, when push came to shove, I didn’t want to devote my life to helping the rich get richer or crunching numbers to see what views were most popular for the vice president to adopt. This wasn’t what my 17 years of education were for.
My doctor parents had drummed into me that education was the key to every door, the one thing they couldn’t take away from my ancestors during pogroms and persecutions. They had also filled me with a strong sense of social justice. I couldn’t help feeling guilty dismay when I thought of the millions of kids who’d never even tasted the great teaching—not to mention the supportive family—I’d enjoyed for my entire life.
I told the Al Gore guy, “Thanks, but no thanks.” Weird as he might have thought it, I had decided to teach in an inner-city school.
January 12, 2007
Separating the Sexes
By Antonio Planas
Las Vegas Review-Journal
January 8, 2007
Luiere said the three-month trial run paid dividends, even though at one point, so few girls were involved she had to make the class exclusively for boys.
"Every student passed," she said. "Some of them by a narrow margin, but everyone passed."
Luiere is continuing her teaching strategy of separating the genders this school year. She is teaching one class to a group of 10 boys and another to a group of 11 girls.
"This year, the achievement by the kids is much higher," Luiere said, noting that the class grade average hovers around 75 percent.
You can read the entire article by clicking here.
October 3, 2006
Let’s take back schools from ‘non-students’
September 21, 2006
A 92 percent homework turn-in rate
...At one of these sessions, a teacher shared that he had been using the pink slip. He had a HORRIBLE time with students not turning in their work. He used the pink slip. He said that the first week he used an entire ream of paper. The next ream lasted him the rest of the school year! His homework turn in rate improved drastically!
At a similar type of session in New Jersey, a principal said that he asked his teachers to use the pink slip. He said that their homework turn in rate increased from 45 percent to 85 percent!!
